Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Houghton v. Pethtel

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1941No. 28331PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Prom the journal entry of the Court of Appeals and statements of counsel in their briefs filed in this court it appears that leave was granted “to substitute L. D. Crowther for Stanley L. Houghton, as relator.” However, the amended petition recites that a motion was allowed to make L. D. Crowther a “party plaintiff.” The amendment did not conform to the leave granted, if any, and was, therefore, filed without leave.

Section 11361, General Code, permits an amendment to a petition, without leave of court, within ten days after demurrer. In this case demurrers were filed but no…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fountain, Recr. v. PierceOhio Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Nimon v. Village of SpringdaleOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State ex rel. Citizens for a Better Portsmouth v. SydnorOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State ex rel. Associated Builders & Contractors, Central Ohio Chapter v. Jefferson County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. State ex rel. Perkins v. Medina Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. State Ex Rel. Abc v. Jefferson Cty. Bd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API