Legal Opinion

Osborne & Co. v. Hanlin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1902No. 19,818PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Jay Circuit Court; J. M. Smith, Judge. Action on notes by D. M. Osborne & Company against John E. Hanlin. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court, under §1337u Burns 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, C. J.

Action by appellant to recover on two promissory notes executed by the appellee. Answer by the latter, demurrer thereto overruled, trial by jury, and verdict returned in favor of appellee, and judgment rendered thereon over appellant’s motion for a new trial. The only alleged error argued and pressed by appellant for reversal is the overruling of its demurrer to the answer. The defendant in his answer to the complaint admits the execution of the notes in suit, but avers that the plaintiff ought not to have and maintain his action thereon, for the reason that about two months before the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Neidefer v. ChastainIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Booher v. GoldsboroughIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Johnston Harvester Co. v. BartleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. McClamrock v. FlintIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Aultman, Miller & Co. v. SeichtingIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sanderson v. Trump Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Zebold v. HurstSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Sommer v. WigenMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Loman v. MasonIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API