Legal Opinion

Sommer v. Wigen

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1936No. 7,595PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Anderson

This action was brought for the foreclosure of a real estate-mortgage given by the defendant to the plaintiff. The complaint was in the usual form for the foreclosure of such a mortgage. The answer admitted the execution and delivery of the note and mortgage, the nonpayment of the taxes on the land, and likewise the failure to pay the mortgage. Affirmatively the defendant pleaded a want or absence of consideration for the mortgage.

The cause was tried before the court sitting without a jury; both parties proposed findings presenting their respective theories of the ease. The trial court found…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States National Bank v. ChappellMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Turner v. PowellMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. WashburnMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Sargent v. WaterburyOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Grimes v. EricsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hodgkiss v. Northland Petroleum ConsolidatedMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Montana Valley Land Co. v. BestulMontana Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Jensen v. FranklinMontana Supreme Court · 1959
  4. State v. OlsonMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. OlsonMontana Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API