Booher v. Goldsborough

action was by the appellants against the appellees, upon a promissory note, payable in lumber, which was given in part consideration for a steam saw-mill sold by the appellants to the appellees.

The appellees filed a joint answer consisting of three paragraphs. Joseph Flannegan and Harrison I. Goldsborough filed a separate answer in two paragraphs. There was no question made in the court below or here in reference to the first paragraph of the joint answer or the separate answer, and they need not be further noticed.

The appellants moved the court to strike out parts of the second paragraph,…