Legal Opinion

McClamrock v. Flint

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1885No. 11,752PublishedCited by 23 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellees agreed to erect and equip a ■wind-mill for the appellant, for which he promised to pay them $100 in cash “ when,” as the contract recites, “ the mill is up and in good working order.” The contract contains, among others, the following provision: “ If you accept this order and ship me the goods Ordered above, it is with the distinct understanding, and is a part of this contract, that if the mill does not work well for sixty days after erected, I am to notify you, and give you sixty days after the receipt •of such notice by you in which to remedy the defect, and if you can not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boothby v. ScalesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Neidefer v. ChastainIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Robinson Machine Works v. ChandlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Booher v. GoldsboroughIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Johnston Harvester Co. v. BartleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Conant v. National State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Shirk v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Brower v. NellisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Gum-Elastic Roofing Co. v. Mexico Publishing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Springfield Engine & Thresher Co. v. KennedyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API