Zebold v. Hurst
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Haskell County; W. H. Brown, Judge. Action by Homer S. Hurst against Robert A. Zebold. Demurrer to answer sustained, judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PRYOR, C.
On the 29th day of April, 1914, the defendant in error, hereinafter designated plaintiff, commenced an action against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter designated defendant, on a certain promissory note given plaintiff by the defendant.
To the amended petition of plaintiff the defendant filed an answer wherein he makes a general denial of the allegations of plaintiff’s petition, and pleads: First, want of consideration for said note; and, second, pleads or attempts to plead duress, to wit, that said note was executed under threats made by plaintiff to the defendant that if…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Morse v. WoodworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Stiles, Treasurer v. City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- New Orleans & N. E. R. v. Louisiana Const. & Imp. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
- Wheeler v. . BillingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Hurst v. SawyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bobier v. HornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Matter of WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- United States National Bank v. ChappellMontana Supreme Court · 1924
- Burford v. Territorial Land Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Taylor v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.