Legal Opinion

Sanderson v. Trump Manufacturing Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1913No. 21,593PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From St. Joseph Circuit Court; Walter A. Funk, Judge. Action by The Trump Manufacturing Company against Edwin N. Sanderson and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

The St. Joseph and Elkhart Power Company was organized and incorporated in this State in 1900 for the purpose of building and maintaining a dam across .the St. Joseph river east of Mishawaka, at a point known as Twin Branch, and erecting and maintaining in connection therewith a power house with hydraulic and electrical machineiy for the purpose of generating and selling electrical current. Thereafter this company let the contract for all the work of construction to the Union Construction Company, a Connecticut corporation, which in turn sublet the work to appellants, engineers and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Buckstaff v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Robinson Machine Works v. ChandlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Booher v. GoldsboroughIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Johnston Harvester Co. v. BartleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Shirk v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Danek v. HommerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  2. Marranca v. HarboSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  3. Muncie Electric Light Co. v. JoliffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. State v. BlancaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  5. US PIPE, ETC. v. United Steelworkers of Am.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API