Neidefer v. Chastain
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Washington Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The complaint of appellant is upon a promissory note executed by the appellee to one Orange Brown.
The appellee answered the complaint in three paragraphs. The first paragraph pleaded a want of consideration ; the second and third alleged that the note was obtained by the *364false and fraudulent representations of the appellant’s assignor. The appellant demurred to the last mentioned paragraphs; his demurrer was overruled, and of this ruling he now complains.
The second and third paragraphs are, in all material respects, the same, and there is no necessity for a separate consideration of each.
The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gatling v. NewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Wiley v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Baker v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Kernodle v. HuntIndiana Supreme Court · 1835
- Smock v. PiersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- City of North Vernon v. VoeglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Lawrence v. GayettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Vulcan Metals Co. v. Simmons Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Conant v. National State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Nysewander v. LowmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.