Legal Opinion

Aultman, Miller & Co. v. Seichting

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1890No. 14,526PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Morgan Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlds, J.

— This is an action brought by the appellant against the appellee upon .a promissory note given by the appellee for a Buckeye down binder.

*138The appellee answered in three paragraphs, also filed a cross-complaint in three paragraphs.

The appellant demurred to each paragraph of answer and cross-complaint, which demurrers were overruled, and appellant excepted to the rulings of the court and assigns such rulings as error.

Appellant also filed a motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and exceptions reserved, and such ruling is also assigned as error.

At the time the appellee gave his order for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Neidefer v. ChastainIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Johnston Harvester Co. v. BartleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. McClamrock v. FlintIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Flint v. CookIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Raulet v. Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. of MilwaukeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Shirk v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Springfield Engine & Thresher Co. v. KennedyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Hitz v. WarnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. IronsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API