State v. Simpson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
We first note ex mero motu that a fatal defect appears on the face of the indictment in Case No. 79-CR-13196 in that defendant is neither named nor otherwise identified in this single-count indictment charging rape of Samantha Cumber.
Article I, § 22 of the Constitution of North Carolina provides:
Except in misdemeanor cases initiated in the District Court Division, no person shall be put to answer any criminal charge but by indictment, presentment, or impeachment. But any person, when represented by counsel, may... waive indictment in non-capital cases.
Where, as here, no…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. TolleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. McNeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. RankinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. DowningSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.