Legal Opinion

State v. McNeil

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1971No. 124PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

Failure to nonsuit constitutes defendants’ first assignment of error. Motion to nonsuit requires the trial judge to consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, take it as true, and give the State the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom. State v. Vincent, 278 N.C. 63, 178 S.E. 2d 608 (1971). “Begardless of whether the evidence is direct, circumstantial, or both, if there is evidence from which a jury could find that the offense charged has been committed and that defendant committed it, the motion to nonsuit should be overruled.”…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. KirbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. PrimesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. DowneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. State v. VincentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. HutchinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API