Legal Opinion

State v. Bailey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1972No. 128PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

The trial judge instructed the jury that “a .22 caliber pistol is a firearm.” Defendant contends the court thus told the jury, in effect, that defendant used a firearm in the commission of the robbery, thereby relieving the State of the burden of proving an essential element of armed robbery. This is defendant’s first assignment of error.

There is no merit in this assignment. The instruction merely informed the jury that a .22 caliber pistol is, in fact, a firearm and should the jury find that defendant used a .22 caliber pistol on the occasion in question then such a weapon…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State v. HutchinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. TolleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. SwiftSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. DetterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API