Legal Opinion
State v. Tolley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided July 14, 1976No. 97PublishedCited by 143 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
On the day before oral arguments were heard in this case, defendant’s appellate counsel filed in the Office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court a written motion to amplify the record on appeal, pursuant to Rules 9 (b) (6) and 37 (a) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, to include four documents, marked Exhibits A, B, C, and D, which were attached to said motion. For the reasons which follow, this motion must be disallowed.
We note initially that the portion of defendant’s motion containing a recitation of fact is outside the scope of Rule 9(b) (3), which enumerates what the…
2Cases cited95 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by143 opinions
- Deck v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- State v. FinchWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. Bryant, Smith and WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. BussIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
- Frye v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.