Legal Opinion

State v. Britt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 15, 1974No. 36PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Justice.

Defendant first assigns as error the action of the trial judge in denying his Motions for “a Judgment of Dismissal” and a directed verdict of not guilty.

The Motion to Dismiss and the Motion for a Directed Verdict of not guilty presented the question of whether the evidence was sufficient to warrant its submission to the jury and to support a verdict of guilty of the offense charged in the indictment. State v. Cooper, 275 N.C. 283, 167 S.E. 2d 266. These Motions have the same legal effect as a Motion for Judgment in case of nonsuit. State v. Glover, 270 N.C. 319, 154 S.E. 2d…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. State v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. IrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State v. HamletSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API