Legal Opinion

State v. Downing

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 27, 1985No. 161PA84PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Chief Justice.

Defendant challenges his conviction of felonious larceny based upon two separate theories: (1) that double jeopardy principles prohibit conviction and sentencing for both felonious break ing or entering and felonious larceny; and (2) that as the result of a fatal variance between the indictment and the evidence as to the ownership of the stolen property, the larceny conviction cannot be sustained. The record supports defendant’s position that there is a fatal variance between the indictment and proof as to the ownership of the stolen property and we reverse on this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. EppleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. . LawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. State v. StinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. Gayton-BarbosaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. State v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Brooks v. N.C. Department of CorrectionDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API