Legal Opinion

State v. Sturdivant

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1981No. 1PublishedCited by 179 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

Defendant has abandoned assignments of error 1, 2, 5, 6 and 12 by failing to advance any argument to support them in his brief. Rule 28(a), North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. He does, however, properly raise seven other assignments of error for our review. After carefully considering all of defendant’s contentions, we conclude that the record reveals no prejudicial error requiring a new trial and, accordingly, affirm the trial court’s due entry of judgment upon his convictions.

We shall address the assignments of error relating to the legality of defendant’s arrest…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. LowrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. AccorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by179 opinions

  1. State v. BagleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. CallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. State v. WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. AbrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. State v. JenningsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993

174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API