Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 29, 1985No. 8524SC181PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

Defendant was convicted of two counts of felonious breaking or entering and two counts of felonious larceny. In this Court for the first time he challenges the sufficiency of the two indictments that he was tried on. This is permitted by our law since jurisdiction to try an accused for a felony depends upon a valid bill of indictment. N.C. Constitution art. I, Sec. 22; State v. McBane, 276 N.C. 60, 170 S.E. 2d 913 (1969). And an indictment that does not allege all of the essential elements of the offense is invalid. State v. Crabtree, 286 N.C. 541, 212 S.E. 2d 103 (1975).

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. McBaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. State v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. DowningSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. JessupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. NixonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  2. State v. MosesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. SiskCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. State v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  5. State v. WilkesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API