Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Schenck

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 2008No. OSB 05-127, 05-128; SC S054585PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged Ronald D. Schenck (the accused) with violating Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rules (DR) 1~102(A)(3) (prohibiting conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation); DR 5-101(A)(l) (prohibiting conflict of lawyer’s self-interest); DR 5-101(B) (barring preparation of instrument giving lawyer or person related to lawyer any substantial gift from unrelated client); DR 5-104(A) (limiting business relations with client); DR 5-105(E) (prohibiting multiple current client conflict of interest); and Oregon Rules of Professional…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. In Re Complaints as to the Conduct of WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SchaffnerOregon Supreme Court · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SchenckOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In re ConryOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  5. State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. ChvalaNebraska Supreme Court · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API