In re Spencer
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar charged the accused with violating two Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC): RPC 1.7(a), which prohibits a lawyer from representing a client without informed consent if “there is a significant risk that the representation *** will be materially limited by *** a personal interest of the lawyer”; and RPC 1.8(a), which prohibits a lawyer from “enter [ing] into a business transaction with a client” without the requisite advice and the client’s consent. A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found that the accused had violated both rules…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChambersOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of AinsworthOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BartlettOregon Supreme Court · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EllisOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- In re DuBoffOregon Supreme Court · 2023
- In re Gregory Mark AbelOregon Supreme Court · 2025
- In re Ellis / RosenbaumOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- In re Gregory Mark AbelOregon Supreme Court · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.