In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Schenck
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In In re Schenck, 345 Or 350, 194 P3d 804 (2008), this court concluded that, in addition to four other disciplinary rules, the accused had violated Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule 5-101(A)(1) (representation of client whose interests conflict with lawyer’s self-interest). As the basis for that violation, this court concluded that the accused had a personal financial interest that either did or reasonably may have affected his professional judgment on behalf of his client. Based on that and the other violations that this court found the accused to have committed, this…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SchenckOregon Supreme Court · 2008
3Cited by6 opinions
- Department of Human Services v. J. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- In re ConryOregon Supreme Court · 2021
- In re RamirezOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- In re RamirezOregon Supreme Court · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.