Harrington v. Paterson
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. John Ellsworth, Judge. The facts are stated in .the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
October 7, 1891, appellant purchased from the plaintiff certain premises in the city of Oakland, with a *543dwelling-house thereon, for the sum of nine thousand dollars. A thousand dollars was paid in cash, and the purchaser assumed and agreed to pay and discharge the mortgage on said premises, previously executed by the plaintiff and her husband to the defendant bank, in the sum of three thousand five hundred dollars; and also executed a note and mortgage to the plaintiff in the sum of four thousand five hundred dollars, the balance of the purchase price.
The action is for the foreclosure of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lataillade v. OreñaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Moore v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Bills v. Silver King Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by11 opinions
- Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Bancroft v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Bradbury v. HigginsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- First National Bank v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Garstang v. SkinnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.