Bradbury v. Higginson
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County. S. E. Crow, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover six hundred dollars, rent claimed to be due under a lease of a house at Montecito, Santa Barbara County. The lease, which is set out in full in the complaint, was for five years from the first day of January, 1905, at a monthly rental of one hundred dollars, and the amount here sued for is the rent for the last six months of the terms, i. e., July to December, 1909. The complaint, which alleges nonpayment of rent after July 1, 1909, was filed on June 18, 1912. In a former action for the recovery of the same sum, commenced in August, 1909, a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Hecht v. SlaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Tarke v. BinghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Bradbury v. HigginsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Bruck v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. FalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Harding v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Strong v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.