Bills v. Silver King Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
The court below sustained a demurrer to the complaint, and, plaintiff declining to further amend, judgment went for defendants. Plaintiff appealed.
The court below correctly sustained the demurrer, and gave judgment for defendants. The demurrer was upon various grounds, among others, that the com*16plaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, that the action is barred by several sections of the code about the limitations of actions, and that the plaintiff is shown to have been guilty of laches. The material averments of the complaint, which are made upon information and…
2Cited by30 opinions
- Lien Huynh v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Thomas v. Pacific Beach Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Williams v. BerginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- MacDermot v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Robertson v. BurrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.