Bancroft v. Woodward
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtOlney, J.
The plaintiffs brought an action to recover . certain installments of rent due them from the defendant according to the terms of a lease between the parties. The defendant answered, denying certain of the allegations of the complaint and, in addition, alleging that he had been induced to execute the lease through a certain fraudulent misrepresentation by one of the plaintiffs. He also, in his answer, set up by way of counterclaim the same fraud and his damage thereby in a very considerable amount. He also filed at the same time a cross-complaint in which he sought a rescission of the lease by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Stuart v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Ruhl v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Richardson v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Hannah v. SteinmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Consolidated Reservoir & Power Co. v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- MacIsaac v. PozzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.