Legal Opinion

Bancroft v. Woodward

California Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1920No. L. A. No. 5309PublishedCited by 61 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlney, J.

The plaintiffs brought an action to recover . certain installments of rent due them from the defendant according to the terms of a lease between the parties. The defendant answered, denying certain of the allegations of the complaint and, in addition, alleging that he had been induced to execute the lease through a certain fraudulent misrepresentation by one of the plaintiffs. He also, in his answer, set up by way of counterclaim the same fraud and his damage thereby in a very considerable amount. He also filed at the same time a cross-complaint in which he sought a rescission of the lease by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Stuart v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Ruhl v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Richardson v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  5. Hannah v. SteinmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Consolidated Reservoir & Power Co. v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. MacIsaac v. PozzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API