Moore v. Boyd
California Supreme Court
Appeal from" a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Hayne, C.
C. — This is an action against certain stockholders of the South Mountain Consolidated Mining ■Company, a corporation having a capital stock of one hundred thousand shares, upon an indebtedness of the company to plaintiffs of $46,953.50, incurred by the company during the months of July and August, 1875. The defendant Lent is alleged to have owned at that time 33,145 shares, the defendant Boyd 11,000 shares, and the defendant Willis “ a large number of shares.” The court below gave judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiffs appeal.
As the positions of the defendants are somewhat…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Bowden v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- National Bank v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- New Albany v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Hunt v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Redington v. CornwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- London & San Francisco Bank, Ltd. v. ParrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.