Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Thompson

California Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1931No. Docket No. L.A. 11422PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

In this cause the opinion of Mr. Justice pro tem. Haines, heretofore rendered by the Honorable District Court of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District has our approval and is hereby adopted as a portion of the opinion of this court herein, as follows:

“Appellant The First National Bank of Calexico, California, brought the present action against the respondent R. 0. Thompson to recover the amount of a promissory note for the principal sum of $10,000 executed to it by him, together with interest, attorney’s fees and costs. Respondent answered, alleging want of consideration and that the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Hazelton v. SheckellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Union Collection Co. v. BuckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Bancroft v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Bovard v. American Horse Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Ting v. AT & TDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
  4. City Lincoln-Mercury Co. v. LindseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Randall v. California Land Buyers SyndicateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API