Garstang v. Skinner
California Supreme Court
(APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. George H. Hutton, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This action was begun against Skinner, The Los Angeles Stove Company, Scholfield, Roser, and Rawlings to recover the sum of fifteen thousand dollars, with interest. Rawlings was not served with process and did not appear. The court made findings and gave" judgment in favor of the plaintiff against Skinner, alone, for $18,740 and costs, and in favor of all the other defendants, except Rawlings, against plaintiff for their costs. Skinner has appealed from said judgment against him and also from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The appellant urges that the complaint is insufficient as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bailey v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Barfield v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Burkle v. LevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Flanagan v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Harrington v. PatersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Garrett v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Latta v. Western Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Fishbaugh v. FishbaughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Schneider v. HenleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.