Lataillade v. Oreña
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County. The facts are stated in the opinion.'
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
The plaintiff commenced this action to obtain an accounting, and the appeal is from a judgment entered against him after demurrer sustained to his third amended complaint.
The facts stated in the complaint are, in substance, as follows: —
On the twelfth day of April, 1849, Csesario Lataillade, *573plaintiff’s father, died intestate, in the town of Santa Barbara, where he was residing, leaving a widow and three minor children, of whom plaintiff, who was born December 2, 1849, was one.
After his marriage to plaintiff’s mother, the decedent purchased two ranchos situated in what is. now the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Badger v. BadgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Levins v. RovegnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- In re the Estate of HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Jorgensen v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.