Legal Opinion

Pleasant View Farms Development, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 9, 1991PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCovello, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court that affirmed a decision of the Wallingford zoning board of appeals (ZBA). The ZBA determined that the plaintiffs did not have the authority to operate a used car dealership in a rural RU-40 zone.1 The issue presented is whether the plaintiffs’ evidence was factually and legally sufficient to support their claimed right to such a use based upon: (1) two prior variances granted to the plaintiffs’ predecessor in title; or (2) a preexisting nonconforming use of the property. We affirm the trial court’s decision that concluded that the ZBA…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Adolphson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Whittaker v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Schwartz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Defelice v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  5. Ward v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Francini v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. R & R Pool & Patio, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. Heithaus v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  5. Doyen v. Zoning Board of Appeals of EssexConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API