Pleasant View Farms Development, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtCovello, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court that affirmed a decision of the Wallingford zoning board of appeals (ZBA). The ZBA determined that the plaintiffs did not have the authority to operate a used car dealership in a rural RU-40 zone.1 The issue presented is whether the plaintiffs’ evidence was factually and legally sufficient to support their claimed right to such a use based upon: (1) two prior variances granted to the plaintiffs’ predecessor in title; or (2) a preexisting nonconforming use of the property. We affirm the trial court’s decision that concluded that the ZBA…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Adolphson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Whittaker v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Schwartz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Defelice v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Ward v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Francini v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- R & R Pool & Patio, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Heithaus v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Doyen v. Zoning Board of Appeals of EssexConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.