Legal Opinion
Adolphson v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 5, 1988No. 13131PublishedCited by 131 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGlass, J.
The plaintiff, Kenneth B. Adolphson, appealed to the Superior Court pursuant to General Statutes § 8-81 as an aggrieved owner of property located within one hundred feet of a parcel of land owned by the defendants, Michael A. and Lori A. Brunetto (Brunettos). The plaintiff claims that the zoning board of appeals of the town of Fairfield (board) erred in granting the application of the Brunettos for three variances and a special exception to the Fairfield zoning regulations (regulations). The state trial referee, exercising the powers of the Superior Court, dismissed the appeal from the board…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Whittaker v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Devaney v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Garibaldi v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- James v. FergusonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by131 opinions
- Spero v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Schwartz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Protect Hamden/North Haven from Excessive Traffic & Pollution, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Scinto v. StammSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.