Legal Opinion

Francini v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 29, 1994No. 14685PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.

This is a landowner’s appeal challenging the validity of the denial of his application for a variance. The plaintiff, William R. Francini, applied to the defendant, the zoning board of appeals of the town of Old Lyme, for a variance from the zoning regulations governing minimum lot area. After a hearing, the board *787denied the plaintiff’s application, and he appealed the board’s decision to the Superior Court pursuant to General Statutes § 8-8 (b).1 The trial court dismissed the plaintiff’s appeal, thus upholding the board’s denial of the variance. Upon the granting of certification by the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Adolphson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Burnham v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Schwartz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Grillo v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Concerned Citizens of Sterling v. Town of SterlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. R & R Pool & Patio, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  3. Wood v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. Konigsberg v. BD. OF ALDERMEN OF NEW HAVENSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. Ammirata v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API