Legal Opinion
Heithaus v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 2, 2001No. SC 16470PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, C. J.
The defendant, the planning and zoning commission of the town of Greenwich (zoning commission), appeals from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the appeal by the plaintiffs, Thomas Heithaus and Marguerite Heithaus, from the zoning commission’s denial of their historic overlay zone application, site plan and special permit request. There are three certified issues on appeal in this matter: (1) whether the trial court properly concluded that the *207process of deciding an application for an historic overlay zone designation is an administrative, rather than a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Sheridan v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- A.P. & W. Holding Corp. v. Planning & Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Kaufman v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Summ v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Felician Sisters of St. Francis of Connecticut, Inc. v. Historic District CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Andross v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Konigsberg v. BD. OF ALDERMEN OF NEW HAVENSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Gibbons v. Historic District CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- A. Aiudi & Sons, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.