Legal Opinion
Whittaker v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 19, 1980PublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The plaintiffs appealed to the Court of Common Pleas from the decision of the defendant Trumbull zoning board of appeals (hereinafter the board) granting a variance to the defendant Ronald L. Esposito allowing him to subdivide into two lots a parcel of land zoned Residence AA and owned by Guido Gismondi. That court dismissed the appeal and the plaintiffs 2 have appealed to this court upon the granting of certification.
The record discloses that on March 23, 1977, the Trumbull planning and zoning commission (hereinafter the commission) approved an application made by the defendant Esposito to…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Devaney v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Sheridan v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Couch v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Town of Windsor v. WhitneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Smith v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Adolphson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Bloom v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Schwartz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Protect Hamden/North Haven from Excessive Traffic & Pollution, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.