Ward v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtCotter, J.
This appeal again raises the question of the sufficiency of the grounds upon which a local zoning authority may grant a variance in the strict application of a municipal zoning ordinance. The defendants Carmela M. and Teresa M. D’Esopo, as owners, and the defendant William P. Keefe, as prospective purchaser, applied to the defendant zoning board of appeals for a variance to permit the location of two doctors’ offices in the D’Esopos’ one-family residence at 240 Ashley Street in Hartford and for a special exception to allow seven parking spaces in the rear of the premises. The plaintiffs,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Parsons v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Krejpcio v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Zieky v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Libby v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Plumb v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Adolphson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Bloom v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Connecticut Building Wrecking Co. v. CarothersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Grillo v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- A.P. & W. Holding Corp. v. Planning & Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.