Legal Opinion
R & R Pool & Patio, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 14, 2001No. SC 16422PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The principal issue in this certified appeal is whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the doctrine of collateral estoppel precluded the trial court from dismissing an appeal by the plaintiffs, R and R Pool and Patio, Inc. (R&R Pool), David Ross, Mitchell Ross and Phillip Ross,1 from a cease and desist order sustained by the defendant, the zoning board of appeals of the town of Ridgefield (board), for violating a zoning variance. See R & R Pool & Patio, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 60 Conn. App. 82, 758 A.2d 462 (2000). The Appellate Court predicated its…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Jackson v. R. G. Whipple, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Bloom v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Lauer v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Delahunty v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Powell v. Infinity InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Efthimiou v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Alexandru v. StrongConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Cadle Co. v. GabelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.