Legal Opinion
Woodburn v. Conservation Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 7, 1995No. 12848PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHennessy, J.
The plaintiff, Richard Woodburn, an environmental intervenor,1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court upholding a decision of the defendant Redding conservation commission (commission) approving an application submitted by the defend*168ants Gerald Casiello and Margaret Casiello for a permit to construct a small pond on their property. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly found that (1) the commission’s decision was supported by substantial evidence, (2) the commission had complied with the feasible and prudent alternative requirement of General Statutes § 22a-41 (b),2 (3)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Cioffoletti v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Gagnon v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Nazarko v. Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Walter v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Flint v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Deangelis v. Iwc, No. Cv 96 132755 (May 16, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
- Eureka v. v. Inland Wetlands Board, No. Cv00-033 93 51 S (Aug. 31, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.