Legal Opinion
Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of Greenwich
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 19, 1987No. 12876PublishedCited by 213 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The plaintiff is Robin B. Huck, the owner of a tract of land comprising 2.691 acres,1 zoned for residential use and located on the westerly side of Stamwich Road in Greenwich. The defendant is the inland wetlands and watercourses agency of the town of Greenwich (agency), which was created pursuant to General Statutes §§ 22a-36 through 22a-45.
On May 22,1978, the plaintiff filed an application for a permit to construct a single-family dwelling on her property which is adjacent to Frye Lake, a regulated watercourse. On January 7, 1980, the agency held a public hearing on that application. At an…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc. v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lawrence v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Feinson v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by213 opinions
- Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Chmielewski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Kaufman v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Jutkowitz v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
208 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.