Legal Opinion

Flint v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 30, 1996No. 15248PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff, Raymond Flint, an employee of the defendant, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, brought an action against the defendant under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act1 for injuries he sustained while attempting to lift a section of railroad track with a jack. The case was tried to the court, but the court declared a mistrial before rendering judgment. The plaintiff then filed a motion to amend his complaint, together with a claim for a jury trial. The trial court, Fracasse, J., granted the plaintiffs motion to amend but struck his jury trial claim. The case subsequently was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Greater Bridgeport Transit District v. State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Val-Pak of Central Connecticut North, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Woodburn v. Conservation CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  4. Flint v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  5. Flint v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Beasley v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. Vogue v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  3. Brown v. HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
  4. Carwin v. St. Vincent, No. Cv97 034 59 79 (Mar. 12, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
  5. Kalinoski v. Cizoce, No. Cv97 0156654 (Nov. 24, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API