Eureka v. v. Inland Wetlands Board, No. Cv00-033 93 51 S (Aug. 31, 2001)
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
This appeal arises from denial by the town of Ridgefield's Inland Wetlands Board (Board) of the plaintiff's request for a permit to conduct regulated activities in and around wetlands. The proposed activities CT Page 12146 concerned five proposed crossings necessary to construct a loop road from Bennett Farm Road to two proposed residential subdivisions. The plaintiff's parcel contains some 682 acres, 243 of which are in Ridgefield's three acre and one acre residential zones. The plaintiff…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Feinson v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Bloom v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Primerica v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.