Gagnon v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission of Bristol
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
The sole issue in this administrative appeal is whether the Superior Court is required to search the record of an inland wetlands commission hearing to determine if there is an adequate basis for the action taken by that commission, where the commission failed to state upon the record the reason for its decision. We hold that the long established rule requiring such a search of the record in appeals from planning and zoning authorities applies with equal force to an appeal from an inland wetlands commission. Accordingly, we conclude that the trial court erred in sustaining the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- A.P. & W. Holding Corp. v. Planning & Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Ralston Purina Co. v. Board of Tax Review of FranklinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Stankiewicz v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Parks v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- DeBeradinis v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Quarry Knoll II Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Paige v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Graff v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.