Legal Opinion

McCoy v. Zahn Corporation

California Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1920No. L. A. No. 6366PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.

This action was brought to recover eight hundred dollars as commissions for services of plaintiff rendered pursuant' to employment in assisting the defendant to procure a loan secured by mortgage on real property. The trial court found that the plaintiff had been employed to procure for the defendant a loan of forty thousand dollars to be secured by mortgage on real property in the city of Los Angeles owned by the defendant corporation and known as the Gordon Apartments, defendant agreeing to pay the plaintiff for his services in “so securing such customer ready and willing to make said loan,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Justy v. ErroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  2. Cone v. KeilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. Massie v. ChatomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hill v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Carlsen v. ZaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Mills v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Industrial Commission v. TolsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Keystone Mortgage Co. v. MacDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API