Legal Opinion

Keystone Mortgage Co. v. MacDonald

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 1967No. Civ. 30112PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHufstedler, J.

Appellant, Keystone Mortgage Co., Inc. (“Keystone”), a licensed real estate broker, sued Jack II. MacDonald and his coadventurers (“MacDonald”) to recover a $7,000 broker’s fee alleged to have been earned by obtaining a loan commitment complying with a written authorization. Judgment was entered for MacDonald following the granting of MacDonald’s motion for judgment pursuant to section 631.8 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1 from which Keystone appeals. 2

Summary of the Evidence, On November 14, 1960, MacDonald signed a written agree.ment prepared by Keystone employing Keystone to obtain a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Milana v. Credit Discount Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Tittle Guarantee & Tr. Co. v. Fraternal Fin. Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Wesley N. Taylor Co. v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Kopf v. MilamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Britschgi v. McCallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Sunshine v. ManosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Never v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Hayward Tamkin & Co. v. Carpenteria Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API