Cone v. Keil
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
This action was instituted to recover the sum of $1,375, alleged to be due as a broker’s commission in negotiating a sale of certain real estate which belonged to the defendants. Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment of non-suit and an order denying a new trial. The case was tried by the court without a jury, and the record before us consists of the judgment-roll and a bill of exceptions, which purports to set out the evidence had in the lower court.
In substance, the undisputed facts of the case, as they appear from the evidence offered upon behalf of the plaintiff, are these: On November…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Brown v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Marshall v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Fitzpatrick v. UnderwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Roth v. ThomsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Sloane v. HammondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Hill v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Dreyfus v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.