Massie v. Chatom
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. William H. Jordan, W. H. Hatton, J. E. Foulds, Frank Shay, and J. W. Hawkins, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This action was brought to enforce the payment of two promissory notes, each for four thousand dollars, which notes were given by defendant to plaintiff. Plaintiff is a real estate agent, and was the agent of defendant for the sale of the latter’s ranch. Defendant, a farmer and the owner of the ranch, entered into a written contract with plaintiff agreeing to pay him a commission for his services in “introducing a purchaser and effecting a sale” of defendant’s Lakeview Ranch. Plaintiff brought to defendant as intending purchasers Louis Bartlett and George J. G. Marsily. In conversation it…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Preble v. AbrahamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Bickerdike v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Dunn v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Smith v. BearCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- American Crystal Sugar Co. v. NicholasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Hicks v. ChristesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Smith v. BearCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Frei Ex Rel. Frei v. GoodsellNevada Supreme Court · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.