Hill v. Knight
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.—
The judgment for the plaintiff in this cause was reversed by the District Court of Appeal, Third District, Mr. Justice Plummer writing the opinion. A petition for a hearing in this court was granted. After further consideration of the record we are satisfied with the reasoning and conclusions of the District Court of Appeal and adopt the same as the opinion of this court. It is as follows:
“This appeal is from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff after motion for new trial had been denied by the court. The action was for recovery of commissions alleged to be due the plaintiff on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Sessions v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Zeimer v. AntisellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Cadigan v. CrabtreeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fitzpatrick v. UnderwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Nelson v. MayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Vidler v. De BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Peterson v. MatchinskeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Abad v. BonhamDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.