Legal Opinion

Carlsen v. Zane

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1968No. Civ. 8697PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

The plaintiffs are copartners and licensed real estate brokers who entered into a 90-day written “exclusive right to sell” agreement with the defendants on January 17, 1965. The agreement contained the following provisions: that the plaintiffs had the exclusive and irrevocable right to sell a 15-acre parcel of unimproved land owned by the defendants until the expiration date of April 17, 1965, for the sum of $3,600 per acre; that the brokers had the right to negotiate sales of the 15 acres in separate 5-acre parcels; that the owners agreed to pay the broker 10 percent of the selling price;…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Alderson v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Kimmell v. SkellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Fleming v. DolfinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Leonard v. FallasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Justy v. ErroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Foltz v. BegnocheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  2. E & E Mining, Inc. v. Flying "D" Group, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Coleman v. MoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Metzenbaum v. R.O.S. AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Bourgoin v. FortierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API