Carlsen v. Zane
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
The plaintiffs are copartners and licensed real estate brokers who entered into a 90-day written “exclusive right to sell” agreement with the defendants on January 17, 1965. The agreement contained the following provisions: that the plaintiffs had the exclusive and irrevocable right to sell a 15-acre parcel of unimproved land owned by the defendants until the expiration date of April 17, 1965, for the sum of $3,600 per acre; that the brokers had the right to negotiate sales of the 15 acres in separate 5-acre parcels; that the owners agreed to pay the broker 10 percent of the selling price;…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Alderson v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Kimmell v. SkellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Fleming v. DolfinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Leonard v. FallasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Justy v. ErroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Foltz v. BegnocheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- E & E Mining, Inc. v. Flying "D" Group, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Coleman v. MoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Metzenbaum v. R.O.S. AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Bourgoin v. FortierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.