Legal Opinion

Mills v. Hunter

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 10, 1951No. Civ. 14514PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERS, P. J.—

Defendant owned a hotel in San Francisco. On December 7, 1948, she gave Milton Meyer and Company, a licensed real estate broker, a written exclusive authorization to sell such property for $75,000 for a period of 10 days. In the contract, which was partially printed and partially handwritten, appears this printed clause: “In the event of a sale hereunder by thé undersigned or by Milton Meyer & Co. during the term specified in this authorization, or any extension thereof (or within ninety days after the expiration of said term to any person with whom said Milton Meyer & Go. has…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sessions v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
  2. Kimmell v. SkellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Lowe v. LoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. McCoy v. Zahn CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Wright & Kimbrough v. DeweesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Continental Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. FetterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  2. Blank v. BordenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Leonard v. FallasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Baumgartner v. MeekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Galbraith v. JohnstonArizona Supreme Court · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API