Mills v. Hunter
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PETERS, P. J.—
Defendant owned a hotel in San Francisco. On December 7, 1948, she gave Milton Meyer and Company, a licensed real estate broker, a written exclusive authorization to sell such property for $75,000 for a period of 10 days. In the contract, which was partially printed and partially handwritten, appears this printed clause: “In the event of a sale hereunder by thé undersigned or by Milton Meyer & Co. during the term specified in this authorization, or any extension thereof (or within ninety days after the expiration of said term to any person with whom said Milton Meyer & Go. has…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sessions v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Kimmell v. SkellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Lowe v. LoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- McCoy v. Zahn CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Wright & Kimbrough v. DeweesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Continental Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. FetterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Blank v. BordenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Leonard v. FallasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Baumgartner v. MeekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Galbraith v. JohnstonArizona Supreme Court · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.