Justy v. Erro
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denying a new trial. H. Z. Austin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The plaintiffs, doing a real estate brokerage business in the city of Fresno, brought this action for the purpose of recovering certain commissions alleged to be due and owing them from defendant for services, rendered under a written contract, in procuring a purchaser and consequently effecting the sale of certain land belonging to the defendant and situated in Madera county.
The cause was tried by the court, a jury having been waived by both parties.
Plaintiffs were given judgment, from which and the order denying him a new trial the defendant prosecutes this appeal to this court.
The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Stewart v. MatherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Kimmell v. SkellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Knapp v. . WallaceNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Hamlin v. SchulteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Sessions v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Russell v. RammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Fleming v. DolfinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Johnson v. KrierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.