Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Gupta
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 19, 2002No. 64A03-0108-CV-259PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRIEDLANDER, Judge.
Charlotte Johnson filed a medical malpractice action against Dr. Arjun Gupta, who responded by filing for summary judgment on grounds that Johnson's action was not timely filed. The trial court granted the motion and entered summary judgment in favor of Gupta. Johnson challenges that ruling as the sole issue upon appeal.
The brief underlying facts were set out in a previous opinion of this court as follows:
Gupta performed a hemorrhoidectomy and mucopexy on Johnson in September 1990. Johnson then began experiencing fecal incontinence. Gupta assured Johnson that the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Johnson v. St. Vincent Hospital, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Martin v. RicheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Van Dusen v. StottsIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Degussa Corp. v. MullensIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Harris v. RaymondIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Booth v. WileyIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Anonymous Physician v. Diana Wininger, Stephen Robertson, Commissioner, Indiana Department of Insurance, and Douglass J. Hill, Panel ChairIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Dorman v. Osmose, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- GYN-OB Consultants, L.L.C. v. SchoppIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Morgan v. Columbus McKinnon Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.