Legal Opinion

Van Dusen v. Stotts

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1999No. 03S00-9711-CV-631PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSelby, J.

This case and two other eases currently pending before this Court address the constitutionality of the two-year medical malpractice statute of limitations contained in Indiana Code section 34-18-7-1 (b) (1998) (repealing section 27-12-7-l(b) (1993)). In each of these cases, plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of the statute of limitations under the Open Courts Clause of Article I, Section 12 and the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article I, Section 23 of the Indiana Constitution.1

In Martin v. Richey, 711 N.E.2d 1273 (Ind.1999) [hereinafter Martin], the lead ease we decide today,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Johnson v. St. Vincent Hospital, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Collins v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Martin v. RicheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Wehling v. Citizens National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Mary Alice Manley, and Gary Manley v. Ryan J. Sherer, M.D., and Sherer Family Medicine, P.C.Indiana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Boggs v. Tri-State Radiology, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Booth v. WileyIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Degussa Corp. v. MullensIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Harris v. RaymondIndiana Supreme Court · 1999

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API